The race to transition away from fossil fuels has created a paradoxical challenge for environmentalists and industrialists alike. While the world demands more batteries for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage, the minerals required to build them are becoming harder to source. This has turned the remote ocean floor into the next geopolitical and ecological battleground.
At the center of this controversy are polymetallic nodules. These are potato-sized rocks that sit loosely on the sediment of the abyssal plains, specifically in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ). The CCZ spans 1.7 million square miles between Hawaii and Mexico.
These nodules are packed with high concentrations of critical metals:
Proponents of deep-sea mining, such as The Metals Company (TMC), argue that harvesting these nodules is the lesser of two evils. They claim that collecting rocks from the barren seafloor generates less carbon dioxide, produces no solid waste, and avoids the deforestation associated with terrestrial mining in places like Indonesia’s rainforests.
Despite the “barren” appearance of the deep ocean, scientists warn that the abyssal plain is a thriving, slow-moving ecosystem that we barely understand. The environment at 4,000 to 6,000 meters deep is stable, cold, and dark. Life there, such as the ghost octopus and various xenophyophores (giant single-celled organisms), grows incredibly slowly.
Mining involves lowering massive collector vehicles, resembling giant combine harvesters, to the seafloor. These machines suck up the top layer of sediment along with the nodules. The minerals are separated, and the waste sediment is pumped back into the water.
The primary concern for marine biologists is the creation of sediment plumes. When the harvesters disturb the silt, they create massive clouds of particles.
Sound travels roughly 4.5 times faster in water than in air. The constant mechanical noise from mining operations and support vessels could disrupt the communication of cetaceans (whales and dolphins) across entire ocean basins. A study published in Science indicated that noise from a single mine could impact a radius of 500 kilometers.
The international waters where these nodules exist are governed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a UN-affiliated body based in Kingston, Jamaica. The ISA is tasked with the dual, and often conflicting, mandate of organizing mining activities and protecting the marine environment.
Tensions escalated recently due to a legal trigger known as the “two-year rule.” The Pacific island nation of Nauru, sponsoring a subsidiary of The Metals Company, triggered this clause in 2021. It effectively forced the ISA to finalize a “Mining Code” by July 2023 or face the obligation to accept mining applications provisionally.
As of 2024, the code is still under fierce debate. The situation has created a global divide:
A major counter-argument to deep-sea mining focuses on battery technology evolution. The argument that we face a shortage of battery metals assumes battery chemistry remains static. However, the market is shifting.
Major corporate brands, including BMW, Volvo, Google, and Samsung, have signed a pledge stating they will not use deep-sea minerals in their supply chains, signaling that the market demand might not be as guaranteed as mining companies claim.
The ISA continues to meet throughout 2024 to negotiate the Mining Code. If The Metals Company submits a formal application for exploitation before the code is finished, the ISA will be in uncharted legal territory. The decision made in those meetings will determine whether the largest habitat on Earth remains preserved or becomes the next industrial frontier.
Who owns the bottom of the ocean? The seafloor in international waters (High Seas) is defined by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as the “common heritage of mankind.” It is managed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA). Profits from mining are theoretically supposed to be shared globally, though the mechanism for this is not yet settled.
How deep is the mining taking place? Nodule mining in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone targets depths between 4,000 and 6,000 meters (13,000 to 20,000 feet). This is deep enough that there is no sunlight, and the pressure is crushing.
Can deep-sea ecosystems recover from mining? Current scientific consensus suggests recovery would be effectively impossible on human timescales. Nodule formation takes millions of years (growing just a few millimeters every million years). The species that live on them cannot return once the hard substrate is removed.
Is any deep-sea mining happening right now? Commercial-scale mining has not yet started in international waters. However, exploration and testing of mining equipment are currently ongoing. Norway has approved exploration in its national waters, and Japan has conducted successful extraction tests in its own Exclusive Economic Zone.